Pretrial Stipulation is Trial Blueprint in Florida State Court

September 14, 2015

In Palm Beach Polo Holdings v. Broward Marine, 40 Fla. Law Weekly D1932 (Fla. 4th DCA Aug. 19, 2015), the issue of whether the underlying claim was barred by the statute of limitations was memorialized in the pretrial stipulation entered between the parties. By definition and policy, this should have been considered a matter officially at issue in dispute during the trial. However, the trial court concluded that because the relevant statute was not framed in the preliminary instructions to the jury and because the appellants did not argue it in their opening statement, the defense was not properly raised and was waived.

The Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeals disagreed. It took the opportunity to remind judges and litigators that the document upon which all parties can always rely on is the Pretrial Stipulation. The appellate court observed that any previous disputes or contentious pretrial issues become mostly irrelevant once the parties prepare and stipulate to the final agreed upon "executive summary” as to what the impending trial will be about and the specific issues that remain on the table. As noted by the court, the Pretrial Stipulation is one of the most “coveted and effective pretrial devices” enjoyed by the trial court and all the parties. The court further noted how the Pretrial Stipulation is a “powerful blueprint” that fully enables a well-run and fair trial. It also stated that the Pretrial Stipulation prescribing issues on which the case is to be tried are binding upon the parties and the court and should be strictly enforced.

Everyone connected with the trial, from the witnesses to well-prepared and efficient lawyers, benefit from a mandated and duly enforced Pretrial Stipulation. The appellate court then rejected the argument that because the statute of limitations issue was not in the preliminary instructions to the jury or referenced in the opening statement, that it was of no consequence.

While a seemingly simple decision, Palm Beach  Polo Holdings is an important one. In this day and age of "gotcha" litigation, parties are increasingly looking for ways to suggest that the other side waived arguments before the court. The Pretrial Stipulation is the document that sets the stage on the issues to be litigated before the trial court.

If you are interested in receiving a copy of this decision or otherwise reaching me, you may do so by writing to me at via this blog or at lawofficesofmov@gmail.com.

Yacht Broker Plans First US-Cuba Voyage Charter Under New Rules

Cuban flag.jpg

It is reported that a Palm Beach County yacht broker received a license issued by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC") to operate a 78-foot yacht between the United States and Cuba. Paul Madden, a longtime luxury yacht broker with Paul Madden Associates LLC, reportedly received the license on July 1 and the vessel is already scheduled to carry and documentary filmmaker and a Wall Street Journal reporter, along with other passengers.

As previously reported in my blog, several other vessel operators have received OFAC licenses to operate to Cuba, including Carnival Cruise Lines. Cruise and ferry companies have applied for government licenses to sail to Cuba since the Obama administration restored diplomatic ties with Cuba and loosened rules for U.S. travel to the island. Carnival is the first cruise line to obtain a license, which plans to start service in May.

But the 78-foot yacht will reportedly be the first vessel to sail between the United States and Cuba in decades. The 4-cabin vessel received a research license from OFAC and the trip is being arranged by a New York educational tour guide, Academic Arrangements Abroad. An advantage to traveling by yacht rather than other forms of transportation, such as planes, is the provision of lodging and food without having to rely on the Cubans. Additionally, a yacht can offer secure Internet access, which is severely limited in Cuba. Furthermore, a smaller yacht can be accommodated within the shallow depths of most Cuban ports. Cruise ships will require much more infrastructure to operate.

Fifteen people are booked to sail from Key West to Marina Hemingway nine miles west of Havana on the historic 4½-hour excursion. Passengers will stay on the yacht, which reportedly plans to proceed afterward to Havana Harbor, Cuba's main port. The plan is for the tour to head back to Key West.

The biggest challenges to passenger services to Cuba is the lack of Cuban infrastructure. In addition, most marine insurers will not insure travel to Cuba, as it is generally outside of the navigational limits of most marine insurance policies.

If you are interested in reaching me, you may contact me via this blog or at mov@chaloslaw.com.

Key Biscayne Sues Again Over Miami's Plan for Marine Stadium

It is reported that less than two weeks after agreeing to try to hammer out a deal, Key Biscayne has filed a third lawsuit over Miami's plan to redevelop Virginia Key. The June 25th petition filed in Miami-Dade Circuit Court is looking to push back the construction that the City of Miami is pursuing around the decaying Miami Marine Stadium.

In one corner, Miami plans to spend $16 million to turn the entrance and several vacant parcels next to the waterfront stadium into a "flex park" capable of hosting large events. Because some of the construction is on historically designated stadium grounds, the City obtained a special dispensation from the historic preservation board and the City Commission in May.

In the other corner, the Village of Key Biscayne maintains that the special dispensation was improvidently granted. The Village claims Miami officials prevented the board from hearing evidence about future uses in violation of Miami's own code. Key Biscayne also claims permission was rushed and lacked all the needed documentation, and the Miami city attorney's office showed bias during the hearing to approve the permit. This latest lawsuit is the Village's third court action over redevelopment of the stadium and surrounding land.

The Miami Marine Stadium, a 1963 marine amphitheater on Biscayne Bay, has been a venue of major contention. Last November, the nonprofit group Friends of Miami Marine Stadium was working behind the scenes to push a plan to renovate the stadium. The non-profit failed to consult Key Biscayne politicians before they held a glitzy event announcing the stadium renovation, which of course, prompted outrage from the politicians who feared a large development on the stadium site.

Then in February, Key Biscayne filed a complaint in Miami-Dade Circuit Court after the City of Miami independently pushed plans to redevelop the stadium site and bring the Miami International Boat Show there as an anchor tenant. Key Biscayne sought an emergency injunction when Miami began preliminary site work with the lawsuit pending.

On April 22nd, the Village filed a second lawsuit against the boat show operator. Key Biscayne has portrayed a boat show on Virginia Key as a traffic and environmental catastrophe. It does not help that contractors doing preliminary work in the basin near the stadium chopped down hundreds of square feet of protected mangroves.

Now this latest lawsuit could affect a scheduled mediation that is supposed to be taking place between the City and the Village. The public comments made by the Village is that the lawsuit was not intended to affect the mediation but was filed to avoid missing the 30-day deadline for challenging the City's action in the Circuit Court. It is true that there is a 30-day deadline to challenge administrative actions. It is reported that some politicians at the City of Miami may now be "back pedaling" due to the "intrusiveness" of the proposed project. Both sides state that the stadium should be renovated, but they are bitterly divided on how this should be done.

Those of us that rely on the marine industry hope that the politicians can work through this for the benefit of the industry.

If you are interested in reaching me, you may do so by writing to me at mov@chaloslaw.com.

Carnival Announces Cruises from Miami to Cuba

July 07, 2015

The world's largest cruise ship operator could be heading to Cuba by May 2016. Various sources report that Carnival Corp. has received U.S. government licenses to offer "purposeful" cruises from the U.S. to Cuba for people-to-people, humanitarian and other exchanges. Carnival says it would become the first American cruise company to visit Cuba since the 1960 trade embargo. The trips will be through its new "fathom" brand, which focuses on trips where passengers sail to a destination in order to volunteer there.

The weeklong cruises are reported to be aboard ADONIA, a small cruise ship which carries 710 passengers. ADONIA is relatively small for the industry, as ships sailing under the company's namesake line can carry nearly 3,000 passengers. ADONIA is a deluxe ship that offers no casino or Broadway-type shows but rather features Spanish classes and workshops on the island's art and heritage. The itinerary is still being finalized, as Carnival is awaiting approval from the Cuban government. The ship is expected to visit several ports and passengers will sleep onboard each night. Carnival is expecting high demand for the voyages and has priced them accordingly. Prices start at $2,990 per person plus taxes and port fees. A similar service-oriented trip on the same ship to the Dominican Republic starts at $1,540 per person.

Cruise ship ADONIAPhoto supplied by Carnival Corp.

Cruise ship ADONIA
Photo supplied by Carnival Corp.

Cuba is still closed for general tourism for Americans under the terms of the U.S. embargo against communist-led Cuba, unless they have family on the island. This measure must be lifted by Congress. Nevertheless, new rules permit U.S. visits to Cuba without a prior license in 12 categories of travel, including the people-to-people type tours now planned by Carnival. Carnival's license comes as part of recent approvals for six passenger vessels from the Treasury Department. The U.S. government has not named the companies who have received these licenses, though as I previously blogged on May 6, 2015, Airline Brokers Co., Baja Ferries USA, Havana Ferry Partners, United Caribbean Lines and America Cruise Ferries have all announced that they have received these licenses. See that article here => Ferries Between Florida and Cuba.

Of the six that have received the licenses, four of them are reportedly authorized to allow passengers and crew to spend the night aboard. The vessels are not allowed to stop at other countries, so an ADONIA cruise from Miami to Cuba will not be a typical Caribbean cruise where the ship will stop at four or five other ports.

There is a lot of interest in waterborne travel to Cuba. Tourism is reportedly a $2.6 billion-plus industry in Cuba and has been one of the main economic drivers keeping Cuba's economy sputtering along. Last year, the country reportedly welcomed a record 3 million visitors. Several sources report that Cuban officials estimate that 1.5 million Americans would travel to the island annually if all restrictions were removed, potentially adding some $2 billion a year to Cuba's economy.

There are many challenges ahead for the country as it opens up to U.S. visitors. There is not enough infrastructure to handle the demand. Reportedly major travel companies including Delta Air Lines, JetBlue Airways, United Airlines, Hilton Worldwide and Marriott International have been closely eyeing developments in Cuba. JetBlue, which has run charter flights from Florida to Cuba for years, just launched a new nonstop flight from New York. It is only open to travelers who are approved to visit Cuba. American Airlines and Sun Country Airlines also offer charters.

If you are interested in contacting me, you may do so by writing to me at mov@chaloslaw.com.